The Company Brain

A living model of your company. Not a search box.

An intelligence layer that understands what the company knows, who knows it, what happened and why, what is true right now, and what should happen next. Every answer is cited and scoped to the person or agent asking. Agents reach it over MCP.

Company Brain =

Memory + Knowledge + Context + Reasoning + Coordination + Action

15 of the capabilities below ship today, each as a named surface you can demo. The rest is the blueprint we are building toward.

Slashh is in private preview. Ask us which of those surfaces cover your sources.

Part I

The core capabilities

Memory, knowledge, decisions, commitments, expertise, reasoning and proactive intelligence.

Knowledge & memory

  • Build an organizational knowledge graph

    Ships today as Entity Profiles

    Models real company entities (people, teams, customers, projects, decisions, systems, metrics, risks) and the relationships between them. This is what separates a brain from enterprise search.

  • Remember the company over time

    Ships today as the Org Time Machine (bi-temporal)

    Temporal memory answers what is true now, what was true three months ago, when it changed, who changed it, and which decision caused it.

    “Why are we using PostgreSQL instead of DynamoDB for this service?”
    PostgreSQL was selected in January after the architecture review. DynamoDB had been proposed in November; the team changed direction because of relational reporting requirements. Sarah and Mike approved it in the Jan 18 architecture meeting.

    Illustrative example

On the blueprint

  • Know everything the company is allowed to know

    Connects Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Jira, GitHub, CRM, support, HR, calendars, meeting transcripts and internal tools, and understands how they relate instead of dumping them into vector search.

Decisions, commitments & expertise

  • Understand decisions

    Ships today as the Decision Log

    Identifies decisions automatically and records the decision maker, alternatives, rationale, evidence, risks, expected and actual outcome, and what superseded it: a Decision Ledger most companies never keep.

  • Build an expertise graph

    Ships today as Who-Knows-About-X

    Knows who actually knows what, inferred from code ownership, documents, resolved tickets, incidents and answered questions, not job titles. Knowledge stays when people leave.

On the blueprint

  • Understand commitments

    Extracts promises made in meetings, Slack, email and tickets (“I’ll send this by Friday”) and tracks owner, due date, source, status and dependencies.

Answers & truth

  • Answer company questions

    Ships today as cited answers

    Answers natural questions about priorities, blockers, customers, ownership and decisions. Every answer carries supporting sources, confidence and any conflicting information.

  • Detect contradictions

    Ships today as the Contradiction Inbox

    Finds the places where company sources disagree and asks which one is authoritative, instead of picking one silently.

    “When is the launch?”
    Conflicting launch dates detected: Notion says October 15, Slack says November 1, Jira says October 25. Confirm the authoritative source with the owner.

    Illustrative example

On the blueprint

  • Understand authority

    Weighs official policy above meeting notes and approved decisions above old proposals, and tracks document status from draft to approved, superseded and archived, instead of returning outdated answers.

Timelines, causes & goals

  • Explain “why”

    The highest-value question inside a company is often why, not what. The brain answers with a causal chain, evidence linked behind every step.

    “Why is Project Atlas delayed?”
    Project Atlas delayed → authentication integration blocked → vendor API unavailable → security review required → legal requested DPA changes.

    Illustrative example

On the blueprint

  • Automatically create a company timeline

    Open any project, customer, product, person or initiative and see its history: proposed, approved, delayed, changed, launched.

  • Track company goals

    Connects goals to initiatives, projects, tasks, people and metrics, so “Why is Goal #3 behind?” traces straight to the blockers. A living strategy graph.

Meetings, process & health

On the blueprint

  • Understand meetings automatically

    Turns every meeting into structured knowledge (decisions, questions, action items, commitments, risks, customer feedback) connected to the entities it touches.

  • Understand company processes

    Learns how work really flows, such as a customer escalation from complaint to fix to notification, and shows the current workflow when someone asks how to do it.

  • Detect knowledge gaps

    Surfaces what the company should know but doesn’t: projects with no owner, critical systems with no runbook, commitments with no due date, documentation that no longer matches the architecture.

  • Detect organizational risks

    Flags bus-factor risk, knowledge decay, vendor dependencies, commitments heading for a miss, and projects built on assumptions that have since changed.

State & foresight

  • Predict second-order effects

    Follows dependencies forward to show what a change will touch before it happens.

    “If we delay Feature X, what gets affected?”
    Feature X → enterprise launch → Customer Acme commitment → a key renewal → Q4 revenue goal.

    Illustrative example

On the blueprint

  • Understand company communication

    Sees which topics are heating up, which problems keep resurfacing, which teams block each other and which decisions keep being revisited: an organizational nervous system.

  • Maintain a “company state”

    Keeps a continuously updated model of goals, initiatives, projects, teams, customers, systems, metrics, risks, decisions, commitments and current issues, refreshed as events happen.

  • Become proactive

    Speaks up without being asked: a launch date engineering can’t hit, three customers asking for the same feature, a promise due Friday whose ticket is still in the backlog.

Surfaces, memory, agents & trust

  • Give every object a “brain page”

    Ships today as Entity Profiles

    Customer, employee and project brain pages bring together history, conversations, commitments, decisions, blockers and metrics, so you stop navigating between apps.

  • Permissions are foundational

    Ships today as fail-closed permissions

    Answers follow identity, roles, source, entity and field-level permissions. If you can’t open an HR document, the brain behaves as though it doesn’t exist for you, and nothing leaks through a summary.

  • Every answer is auditable

    Ships today as the hash-chained audit log

    Every answer shows its evidence, its confidence and what it relates to, so anyone can check it.

    “Why was Project Atlas delayed?”
    The launch moved from September 30 to October 18, mainly because the security review found an authentication issue. Evidence: security review (Sep 18), architecture meeting (Sep 20), Jira EPIC-381 (Sep 21). Confidence: high.

    Illustrative example

On the blueprint

  • Support multiple kinds of memory

    Semantic, episodic, decision, procedural, relational, temporal, commitment and causal memory, which is much closer to how organizations actually remember.

  • Agents work on top of the brain

    Executive, engineering, sales, customer, HR, project and risk agents all reason over the same understanding instead of querying every system on their own.

The bigger idea

Understanding first. Then search, reasoning and agents.

Most enterprise AI is a pipeline over documents. A Company Brain builds a continuously updated model of the organization and puts AI on top of it.

Typical enterprise AI

  1. Documents
  2. Embeddings
  3. Vector search
  4. LLM

Company Brain

  1. Company data
  2. CommunicationsSystemsDocuments
  3. Understanding
  4. Entity + event extraction
  5. Knowledge graphTemporal memory
  6. Company state
  7. SearchReasoningAgents
  8. Actions

Part II

The missing layers

Identity, trust, semantics, personal and team views, organizational learning, governance, simulation and self-improvement.

Identity, ontology & events

4
  • Identity resolution

    John Smith, jsmith, john-s on GitHub and U12345 on Slack resolve to one person, with confidence scoring and kept aliases. The same goes for customers, vendors, systems and projects.

  • Organizational ontology

    A flexible, extensible model of what the company considers meaningful (people, teams, goals, systems, incidents, decisions) and how they relate, instead of everything hard-coded around documents.

  • Event model

    Understands events as well as entities: who did what, to what, when, why and with what result. Events are what build the organizational timeline.

  • Immutable organizational event log

    An event-sourced log from which current state is derived, giving history, provenance and the ability to reconstruct what the company knew on any date.

Trust, provenance & truth maintenance

6
  • Provenance graph

    Ships today as per-fact provenance

    Every fact records its sources, extraction method, timestamp, confidence, author and last verification, so uncertain information never passes as truth.

  • Fact lifecycle

    Ships today as bi-temporal facts

    Facts move from observed to confirmed, disputed, superseded or expired. Old facts keep their validity windows instead of being deleted: a bi-temporal knowledge system.

  • Confidence modeling

    Each assertion carries confidence, authority, freshness and source count. Trust combines source authority, agreement between sources, freshness and extraction confidence.

  • Source authority hierarchy

    Configurable authority from board-approved policy down to AI inference, varying by topic: CODEOWNERS can outrank Notion for ownership, Salesforce outranks Slack for pipeline.

  • Freshness awareness

    Ships today as the freshness guardrail

    Notices when a fact has aged, such as an account owner who left six months ago, downgrades its confidence and asks for verification. Knowledge decay, managed.

  • Automatic knowledge reconciliation

    When Notion, Jira and Slack disagree about an owner, the brain reconciles them into previous owner, current owner, effective date and evidence.

Company language & semantics

4
  • Organizational semantic layer

    Ships today as the Jargon Decoder

    Builds a glossary of the company’s own language (“Red Account”, “Launch Ready”, “P0”), with who uses each term and what it relates to.

  • Acronym resolution

    Ships today as the Jargon Decoder

    Infers the meaning of the hundreds of acronyms every company accumulates, including the internal-only ones, from how they are used.

  • Concept graph

    Connects documents, people, projects and decisions around concepts like Zero Trust, RBAC or SSO, which surfaces knowledge nobody knew to look for.

  • Organizational taxonomy management

    Maps how different teams classify the same things, so Marketing’s “Enterprise” lines up with Finance’s “Strategic”.

Context & personal views

7
  • Contextual retrieval

    The same question gets a different emphasis for different askers: an engineer sees tickets and code changes, a CEO sees launch status, customer impact and risk.

  • User-specific context

    Knows who is asking, their team, what they own and work on, their permissions and the level of detail that suits them.

  • Working memory

    Understands the task at hand. Before a meeting with Acme it gathers the last meeting, open commitments, recent tickets, renewal status and internal risks.

  • Personal work brain

    Every employee gets a private view: what to do today, what they promised, what they’re waiting on, meetings to prepare for and people waiting on them.

  • Team brain

    Team views such as an Engineering Brain (initiatives, incidents, releases, architecture decisions, ownership gaps) and a Sales Brain (pipeline, objections, renewals, risk accounts).

  • Executive brain

    Leadership sees company health, revenue, customers, execution, risks and the decisions required, and can simply ask “What needs my attention?”

  • Decision inbox

    Pending decisions arrive with context, options, arguments, evidence, affected parties and similar past decisions. Humans still decide; the brain prepares the decision.

Tracking what goes unresolved

8
  • Organizational “open loops”

    Tracks everything started but not resolved: unanswered questions, incomplete commitments, incidents without root cause, tasks without owners, decisions awaiting approval.

  • Question tracking

    Extracts questions that would otherwise disappear in chat and tracks who asked, the likely owner, status and answer, so unanswered questions become visible.

  • Assumption tracking

    Records project assumptions (“latency stays under 200ms”, “no extra compliance review”) with owner, evidence and dependent projects, and alerts when one stops holding.

  • Hypothesis tracking

    Links each hypothesis to its experiment, metric and result, so the company stops re-testing the same ideas without memory of the last attempt.

  • Experiment memory

    Answers “Have we tried this before?” with the earlier experiment, its results and the discussion around it.

  • Failure memory

    Preserves incidents, failed experiments, cancelled projects, lost deals and architecture mistakes, and why they happened. Companies forget failures faster than successes.

  • Lessons learned graph

    Every important project or incident leaves queryable lessons (what worked, what failed, why, what we would change) for future initiatives.

  • Pattern detection

    With enough history, spots patterns such as custom-SSO enterprise projects slipping 2–4 weeks because security review starts too late.

Dependencies, resources & continuity

5
  • Cross-functional dependency graph

    Maps how a marketing launch depends on a release, which depends on a feature, a security approval and a legal review, so “What could block the launch?” has an answer.

  • Resource graph

    Connects people, budget, cloud resources, vendors, licenses and capacity to projects, which enables real capacity reasoning.

  • Organizational load

    Understands workload structurally, such as where projects and responsibilities concentrate, without becoming employee surveillance.

  • Dependency risk

    Flags critical flows with a single point of failure, such as a payment system that relies on one vendor API with no fallback.

  • Bus-factor intelligence

    Goes beyond who knows a system to calculate continuity: how many people could run it, how current its documentation is, and what breaks if one person leaves.

People lifecycle

4
  • Employee onboarding

    Instead of 50 documents, a new hire asks “Teach me how this company works” and gets the product, architecture, processes, key people and current priorities.

  • Role transition

    Knows what the previous person in a role owned, which meetings matter and which systems and processes they ran, so stepping into a role starts with context.

  • Employee offboarding

    Before someone leaves, generates a transition plan covering systems and projects owned, open commitments, undocumented knowledge and external relationships.

  • Succession knowledge

    Answers “If our Head of Infrastructure left tomorrow, what would become risky?” by finding the systems, vendors and decisions concentrated with one person.

Meetings & relationships

6
  • Meeting preparation

    Ships today as Meeting Prep

    Before every meeting: the objective, participants, last discussion, outstanding actions, recent changes, relevant decisions and open questions.

  • Meeting follow-through

    After the meeting, captures decisions, owners, deadlines, commitments and risks, and updates company state automatically.

  • Relationship intelligence

    Understands each external relationship: executive sponsor, champion, technical contact, support history, renewal, open promises and product usage.

  • Stakeholder maps

    For any initiative, infers the decision maker, owner, contributors, reviewers, affected teams and executive sponsor.

  • Communication network

    Shows how work actually flows between teams, where links are strong, weak or a bottleneck, for organizational efficiency rather than surveillance.

  • Information flow analysis

    Finds where information stalls, such as customer feedback that reaches Product but rarely Engineering, or incident lessons that never reach support.

Duplication

3
  • Duplicate-work detection

    Notices when two teams are independently building the same thing, and answers “Is someone already doing this?”

  • Duplicate-idea detection

    Recognizes when an idea was discussed before and shows the earlier proposal, who was involved, why it stopped and what’s different now.

  • Redundant tool detection

    Spots when several teams pay for different tools that perform the same workflow, and surfaces consolidation opportunities.

Policy, compliance & process

6
  • Policy intelligence

    Treats policies as executable knowledge, so a question like “Can I expense a $1,500 monitor?” gets a direct, cited answer.

  • Compliance memory

    Tracks policies, controls, evidence, audits, exceptions, owners and reviews across security, finance, HR and legal.

  • Policy-vs-reality detection

    Detects when what actually happens deviates from what the policy says.

  • Process mining

    Reconstructs how processes really run from event streams, such as lead to demo to security review to procurement to closed won.

  • Process deviations

    Detects when a step is skipped, such as a deployment that went from review straight to production without approval.

  • Automation discovery

    Finds workflows that repeat dozens of times a month with the same steps, the strongest candidates for automation.

Agents & actions

3
  • Agent action layer

    Agents do real work on top of the brain: create a ticket from a customer issue, draft a project brief, prepare a launch checklist, send meeting follow-ups.

  • Action authorization

    Every action carries a policy level (read, suggest, draft, request approval, execute), so autonomy is granted deliberately.

  • Action audit trail

    Every AI action records the agent, action, reason, evidence used, permissions, timestamp, approval and result.

Simulation, strategy & metrics

7
  • Simulation

    Answers “What happens if we postpone Project Atlas by a quarter?” by following the effects through launches, commitments, pipeline, revenue and hiring.

  • Scenario planning

    Combines organizational dependencies with metrics to explore scenarios like slower revenue growth or a vendor shutting down.

  • Strategic memory

    Keeps why each strategy was chosen (objective, alternatives, assumptions, expected and actual outcomes), so leadership can revisit decisions with real history.

  • Strategy-to-execution traceability

    Links mission to strategy, goals, initiatives, projects, tasks and metrics, and finds the projects not connected to any company priority.

  • Metrics knowledge graph

    Treats metrics as entities with a definition, formula, source, owner, dashboard and change history, so “Why does Finance ARR differ from Sales ARR?” has an answer.

  • Metric lineage

    Traces any number from dashboard to definition, transformation, warehouse table and source system.

  • Metric anomaly understanding

    When churn rises, searches releases, incidents, complaints, pricing and sales changes for correlated evidence, and keeps correlation distinct from cause.

Pulse & attention

6
  • Organizational pulse

    A continuous Company Pulse for each role: wins, risks, decisions, deadlines, escalations, incidents, blockers and metrics moving unexpectedly.

  • Change intelligence

    Answers “What changed since yesterday?” with only the meaningful changes: statuses, decisions, escalations, releases, new dependencies.

  • “What did I miss?”

    Back after two weeks, an employee asks one question and gets the decisions, project changes, deadlines and people waiting on them, instead of reading Slack.

  • Attention management

    Scores urgency, impact, relevance, dependency, authority and deadline, and surfaces what actually matters.

  • Intelligent notification suppression

    Combines 17 related changes into one meaningful update instead of 17 alerts, so proactive AI stays bearable.

  • Company inbox

    One inbox for what needs your decision, review, response or approval, plus detected risks, commitments coming due and knowledge needing verification.

Human curation & knowledge quality

4
  • Knowledge requests

    When unsure, the brain asks instead of guessing: it suggests a likely owner, that person confirms, and the brain gets smarter.

  • Human-in-the-loop knowledge curation

    People can confirm, correct, merge, reject, supersede or mark any piece of knowledge authoritative, making the knowledge base self-improving.

  • Knowledge reputation

    Learns over time which sources are reliable, which improves answer quality.

  • Knowledge ownership

    Every important knowledge object has an owner, which prevents knowledge rot.

Security & boundaries

4
  • Semantic access control

    Permissions apply to entities, relations, properties, sources and time, not just documents: you may see a project’s name but not its budget.

  • Inference permission safety

    The brain never infers restricted facts indirectly, such as hinting at a promotion from compensation data the asker can’t see.

  • Knowledge firewall

    Executive, HR, legal, security, general and customer-specific knowledge stay in separate contexts, so restricted information never blends into an answer.

  • Multi-company boundaries

    Tenant boundaries are absolute: no embeddings, caches, training artifacts or agent memory ever cross from one company’s brain to another.

Market, customers & ideas

6
  • External knowledge

    Connects market news, competitor releases, regulations and public filings to internal knowledge, such as which active deals need a feature a competitor just shipped.

  • Competitive intelligence

    Maintains competitors, products, pricing, positioning, customer mentions and win/loss reasons, so “Why do we lose against Competitor X?” has evidence.

  • Market memory

    Tracks how the company’s assumptions about its market changed over time, and why.

  • Customer voice aggregation

    Unifies feedback from calls, tickets, NPS, communities, email, reviews and feature requests, and clusters the recurring needs.

  • Idea graph

    Recognizes that a Slack question, a meeting comment and a ticket are all the same idea, such as offline mode.

  • Innovation memory

    Preserves brainstormed ideas without polluting authoritative company state, keeping facts, decisions, proposals, ideas and hypotheses distinct.

Reasoning & causality

5
  • Argument graph

    For important decisions, captures the reasoning on each side and connects it to evidence and participants.

  • Counterfactual reasoning

    Explores questions like “If we had chosen Kubernetes, what would have changed?”, always labeled as hypothetical, never as fact.

  • Organizational causal graph

    Links causes to effects across the company, each link carrying its evidence strength, enabling deeper analysis over time.

  • Root-cause memory

    For incidents, failures, churn and missed deadlines, records the immediate cause, contributing factors, root cause, and corrective and preventative actions.

  • Organizational anti-pattern detection

    Finds systemic problems: projects that keep launching without security review, requirements that keep reaching engineering late, the same incident recurring.

Traversal & the digital twin

4
  • “Why are we doing this?”

    Click any task and traverse upward through feature, project and initiative to the company goal it serves.

  • “What does this affect?”

    Traverse downward from any decision to the projects, features, customers and revenue it touches. Impact analysis is core.

  • Work graph

    One unified representation of how the company actually works: people, goals, projects, tasks, decisions, systems and customers, connected.

  • Digital twin of the company

    A continuously updated model of structure, people, knowledge, work, systems, customers, decisions, processes, dependencies, metrics, risk and history.

Platform interfaces & compilers

4
  • Company API

    Beyond chat, an API lets other internal applications query the brain for entities, decisions, timelines and context.

  • Company Brain as MCP/tool layer

    Agents call the brain as a tool to find owners, decisions, commitments, impact and context, with permissions enforced.

  • Context compiler

    Instead of dumping 500 documents into a model, it builds the smallest, highest-quality set of facts for the task: intent, entities, permissions, graph, time and authority.

  • Memory compiler

    The write side of the brain: every message, meeting and document passes through entity, event, decision, commitment and fact extraction, then reconciliation into company state.

Memory engineering

8
  • Episodic versus canonical memory

    Keeps what was said (episodic) separate from what is true (canonical), and derives canonical state from episodic history.

  • Evidence-preserving summarization

    Summaries never destroy detail. A CEO reads one sentence; an engineer drills down to the exact Slack message behind it.

  • Knowledge compression

    Progressively compresses years of history (10,000 messages into events, decisions and major developments) while raw evidence stays recoverable.

  • Memory retention policies

    Data carries retention periods, legal holds, deletion and archival policies, and the brain honors the source system’s requirements.

  • Right-to-delete propagation

    When something is deleted at the source, lineage carries the deletion through to extracted facts, summaries and derived relationships.

  • Knowledge versioning

    Documents have versions and entities have states over time, so time travel works naturally.

  • Query time travel

    First-class questions like “What did we know before the outage?” or “Who owned the system in March?”

  • Organizational replay

    Replays the sequence of events leading up to an outage or decision, for learning and audits.

Exploration & understanding

7
  • “Explain this company to me”

    A new leader asks once and gets what we sell, who buys it, how we make money, key teams and systems, strategy, current problems and recent decisions.

  • “How does X work here?”

    Shows the documented process next to the observed one, for releases, sales handoffs, promotions or product development.

  • Company-wide memory search

    Search by keyword, meaning, entity, relationship, time, person, decision, event or concept, such as decisions involving AWS during 2025.

  • Exploration UI

    You don’t need to know what to ask: click through relationships and traverse the company graph.

  • Company map

    Visualizes the organization as a strategy map or a dependency map, from goals through teams and systems to customers.

  • Knowledge heatmap

    Shows where the company’s knowledge is strong, weak, outdated, held by one person, or conflicting.

  • Organizational health scorecards

    Separate, evidence-backed scores for knowledge coverage, decision clarity, ownership, documentation freshness, dependency resilience and commitment health, not one meaningless number.

Extensibility & self-improvement

7
  • Brain skills marketplace

    Installable skills (Incident, Sales, Hiring, Architecture, Customer and Compliance Intelligence) that all run over the same brain.

  • Custom agent builder

    Build agents like “Every Monday, find customer commitments engineering may miss” that use the brain instead of querying dozens of systems.

  • Brain triggers

    Events invoke agents: a new commitment, a conflicting status or an incident can start work automatically.

  • Self-healing knowledge

    The brain repairs itself: it detects an unknown owner, suggests a likely one, asks a human to verify, and updates the graph.

  • Self-improving ontology

    Notices new concepts that keep appearing, such as “Design Partner”, and proposes adding them to the ontology.

  • Self-improving extraction

    When someone corrects it (“that was a proposal, not a decision”), it learns the pattern for this organization.

  • Organizational language model

    Learns how this specific company communicates through its ontology, glossary, entity graph, authority rules and history, not necessarily model training.

Institutional wisdom

12
  • Organizational identity

    Understands mission, values and cultural norms, and separates written policy, historical precedent and common practice when asked how things are normally done.

  • Precedent search

    Answers “Have we faced this before?” with similar escalations, incidents, pricing exceptions or migrations, and what happened.

  • Exception memory

    Tracks each rule’s exceptions (who approved them, why, for how long and how broadly) so exceptions don’t become invisible precedent.

  • Organizational promises

    Models internal, customer, partner, public, regulatory and contractual promises separately, because each carries different risk.

  • Obligation graph

    The general form of every commitment: obligation, owner, beneficiary, due date, source, status and penalty or risk.

  • Attention graph

    Shows where the company’s attention is going, such as a quarter of leadership discussion on the AI platform. Trend analysis, not employee monitoring.

  • Emerging-theme detection

    Sees hundreds of small signals and names the theme, like security review delays appearing across four projects at once.

  • Weak-signal detection

    Catches issues before they land: complaints creeping up, objections repeating, scaling worries in engineering threads. Individually small, together meaningful.

  • Organizational anomaly detection

    Spots anomalies (no release in six weeks, a customer’s cases jumping from 2 to 17, cloud cost up 80% without usage) and connects them to company context.

  • Decision-quality feedback

    Compares each decision’s expected result with the actual one, so the company learns which kinds of decisions it gets right.

  • Organizational learning loops

    Closes the loop from decision to action, outcome, learning and an updated policy or process. Most companies stop at action.

  • Company Brain as institutional memory

    People leave, teams change, tools change, Slack scrolls away and decisions are forgotten. The brain is the memory that stays.

Part III

The ten layers.

Everything above in one stack, built from the systems you already run up to the experience people use.

The highlighted layers are the organizational memory and state engine: the real product.

  1. ExperienceChat, Search, Explore, Dashboards, Personal Brain, Team Brain, Executive
  2. AgentsResearch, Monitor, Analyze, Act
  3. Reasoning / contextContext compiler, Planning, Causal reasoning, Impact analysis, Simulation
  4. Company stateGoals, Projects, People, Customers, Risks, Commitments, Decisions, Metrics
  5. Knowledge graphEntities, Relations, Events, Concepts
  6. MemoryEpisodic, Semantic, Temporal, Procedural, Decision, Causal, Commitment
  7. Knowledge processingExtraction, Resolution, Reconciliation, Dedup, Classification, Summarization
  8. TrustProvenance, Authority, Confidence, Permissions, Audit, Retention
  9. Integration / eventsConnectors, CDC, Webhooks, APIs
  10. Company systemsSlack, Gmail, Drive, GitHub, Jira, CRM, HRIS, Databases, Analytics, and more

Don’t build “ChatGPT connected to company apps.”

Build a living, temporal, permission-aware representation of the company, with AI sitting on top of it. Chat, search, agents, dashboards and proactive monitoring all become applications of the same underlying Company Brain.

The real product is not the chatbot. It is the organizational memory and state engine underneath it.

Bring the question you keep asking.

We’ll show you how the Company Brain answers it: sourced, scoped to the asker, and correct as of the date you choose.