Skip to content
slashh

Your tools hold the pieces. Slashh connects them.

Your company already knows.
Find the answer.

Company memory for people and AI agents. Bring conversations, documents, and decisions together—with the sources, history, and permissions intact.

Meet Slashh Explore a working example
NContract + invoiceDOC

Finance / Vendor spend

Invoice vs contract

Contracted: $8,000/month. Invoiced: $10,000/month for 20 services at $500 each — $2,000 above the contracted amount.

MCSource snapshot · today
#Service usage report
JR
Finance reviewSample record

This month’s usage report: 14 services used, 6 with no recorded usage. Those 6 services cost $500 each per month.

Related evidence · sample content
Answer, with the context attached

What are we paying for but not using?

You’re paying for 20 services, but your team used only 14 this month. The 6 unused services cost $3,000/month — 30% of your service spend is going unused.

Scoped to your team · current context
MC
Maya ChenService owner
JR
Jules RiveraConnector reviewer
14:30
Acme renewal briefingCommitments · delivery dates · open questions
Ready to review
09:10Configuration changed
09:24Alert received
10:05Runbook updated
↗
Next: review the 6 unused subscriptionsIllustrative usage · check cancellation terms

Connect subscriptions to actual usage. See what you pay for, what gets used, and where spend goes unused.

Try a source, date, or permission above.

One memory. Different moments.

For the work between the tools.

From a first day to a difficult decision, keep the context close.

One memory layer. Explore the full toolkit.

Entity profiles

People, systems, and projects with their sources attached.

Jargon decoder

Understand the terms your company actually uses.

Find expertise

Find people through their contributions and evidence.

Contradiction inbox

See where coexisting sources disagree.

Org time machine

Revisit what was true and what was known at a chosen time.

Decision log

Recover decisions, tradeoffs, and their original context.

Meeting prep

Bring relevant commitments and account context together.

Smart context cards

See linked context around people, tickets, and work.

Offboarding briefs

Bring responsibilities and knowledge into a handover.

Audit & evidence

Attribute agent calls and export access evidence.

Value & freshness

Review metered value and identify superseded facts.

Developer toolkit

Connect over MCP, the SDK, LangGraph, or CrewAI.

Explore the product in detail

The work between your tools.

Less searching.
More moving
forward.

Someone on your team already knows. Slashh brings their decisions, conversations and documents into the moment you need them.

Bring us your team’s question

Source-linked answers.
Your team’s permissions, respected.

Choose a workflow

An account lead, before the call

“What did we promise—and can we deliver?”

The context comes together

  • Account conversation

    “SSO will be ready in Q2.”

    ↗
  • Product roadmap

    Delivery moved to Q3.

    ↗
  • Project ownership

    The platform team owns the next update.

    ↗

One brief. The promise, the change, the owner.

Align on the delivery plan before the renewal conversation.

A finance lead, before renewal

“Which services are we paying for but not using?”

The context comes together

  • Subscription invoice

    20 services billed this month.

    ↗
  • Usage report

    14 used. Six with no recorded activity.

    ↗
  • Service owners

    Confirm the business need for each subscription.

    ↗

A review list your team can act on.

Bring usage and billing together, then check terms before cancelling.

A new teammate, on their first day

“Who owns Billing v2, and where do I start?”

The context comes together

  • Engineering handbook

    The platform team maintains Billing v2.

    ↗
  • Launch decision

    Maya owns the migration plan.

    ↗
  • Project discussion

    Jules is reviewing the connector.

    ↗

The right people. The reasoning. A starting point.

Start with the current plan and the people who know the work.

Illustrative workflows and portraits · explore a different story above

One diagram, five stages

Every system in. Real workflows out.

Keep scrolling. The diagram builds itself as the notes explain each stage — your sources, the edges pulling inward, the graph where every fact carries two clocks, the permission membrane closing, then cited analysis that feeds your team’s helpers, reviews and configured agent workflows.

Stage 01 — sources SAP ERP Ironclad Contracts Workday People Salesforce Customers Slack Conversations Notion Documents GitHub Code Cloud Infrastructure Connected intake OAuth · continuous sync People Owner · team · expertise Decisions Evidence · outcome Knowledge Facts · relationships Valid time + known time on every fact Permission checkOwner ACL ∩ scopes DeniedNever retrieved Allowed Cited analyses Risk · value · finance · ownership Meeting helperAccount leadROI & valueFinance leadAnalyzerProduct analystKnowledge transferTeam leadEvidence validatorFinance reviewerReconciliationsFinance operationsOnboardingNew teammateOffboardingTeam managerAutomationsWorkflow owner
Meet the people behind nine workflows

The foundation is ready. Now put it to work.

Company context becomes
real work, moving forward.

Cited analysis feeds the helpers, reviews and agent workflows your team actually uses. Every workflow starts with the relevant evidence, permissions and history.

Cited analysis & company context

Prepare

Meeting helperAccount lead
  1. Context Account notes + commitments
  2. Review Review open promises before the call
  3. Output A cited meeting brief

Walk in with the context.

Gather attendees, recent activity and open decisions into a permission-aware meeting brief.

Meeting prep packet
Knowledge transferTeam lead
  1. Context Decisions + project ownership
  2. Review Review what the next owner needs
  3. Output A source-linked handover

Keep what the team learned.

Connect decisions, expertise and source material so the next person can follow the work without starting from scratch.

People, decisions and source context

Carry work forward

OnboardingNew teammate
  1. Context Role context + team handbook
  2. Review Find the owner and first steps
  3. Output A first-week orientation brief

Find your starting point.

Discover the people, terminology and decisions around your role, with supporting documents to explore.

Entity profiles, glossary and expert finder
OffboardingTeam manager
  1. Context Responsibilities + authored work
  2. Review Confirm the next owners
  3. Output A knowledge handover checklist

Make the handover concrete.

Assemble a person’s knowledge footprint: what they owned, the decisions they touched and who else knows the domain.

Offboarding brief

Understand & validate

ROI & valueFinance lead
  1. Context Invoices + service usage
  2. Review Review unused spend and assumptions
  3. Output An opportunity list with evidence

Understand the value behind the work.

Explore value and cost evidence. Keep estimates, assumptions and supporting sources visible when evaluating returns.

Value reporting and ROI evidence
AnalyzerProduct analyst
  1. Context Decisions + source history
  2. Review Compare changes and conflicting facts
  3. Output An analysis with source references

Follow the decision and its history.

Explore relationships, conflicting facts and changes over time to understand how the current situation came about.

Decision log, contradictions and historical context
Evidence validatorFinance reviewer
  1. Context A finding + its cited sources
  2. Review Check the calculation and support
  3. Output A reviewed finding or flagged gap

Check the basis of a finding.

Trace a claim or figure to its evidence. In the ROI analysis pipeline, the auditor rechecks proposed items and drops or downgrades unsupported findings.

Evidence review within the ROI pipeline

Put context to work

ReconciliationsFinance operations
  1. Context Contract terms + invoice lines
  2. Review Review mismatches under agreed rules
  3. Output An exception brief for review

Compare what should agree.

Scope a review of records across your sources, the matching rules and how exceptions should be handled. Availability depends on the systems and workflow agreed for your deployment.

Workflow to scope
AutomationsWorkflow owner
  1. Context Cited context + configured tools
  2. Review Review scope and action permissions
  3. Output A brief for a configured agent workflow

Give an agent the right context.

Use the MCP interface or framework adapter inside your agent workflow. Available reads, writes and downstream actions depend on the tools and permissions you configure.

Agent integration; actions scoped separately

Illustrative portraits and roles. Explore the context, review and output for each workflow. Tools and action permissions depend on your configuration.

Discuss your workflow

01 Sources

All your systems, and no shared map between them

The ERP, the CLM, the CRM, the HRIS, the ticket queue, the wiki, the repo, the cloud bill. Each one holds part of every answer your company has already worked out; none of them holds the whole thing, and the connections between them are easy to lose. Review API or MCP access and connector coverage for the systems you want to include.

  • SAP
  • Ironclad
  • Workday
  • Salesforce
  • ServiceNow
  • NetSuite
  • Slack
  • Notion
  • GitHub
  • Jira

Connectors over OAuth · you approve on their site · tokens stored encrypted

02 Edges

Everything pulls toward one place — and keeps pulling

You authorize once. After that a scheduler re-syncs every connection on its own cadence: cloud accounts every 6 hours, everything else every 2. Queued, rate-limited, backed off when a credential breaks. Nobody clicks refresh, and nothing quietly goes stale in the corner.

Re-syncs every 2h · cloud every 6h · self-updating by design

03 Graph

It becomes a graph, and every fact carries two clocks

Each document is read into one graph: the people, decisions and topics inside it, and how they connect. Every fact records when it was true and when we learned it — so “what did we know in March?” is a question with a correct, cited answer. Earlier versions preserve the context behind a change.

Bi-temporal · as_of on every read · superseded facts kept and flagged

04 Membrane

A permission membrane closes, and it fails closed

Retrieval is trimmed to owner-ACL ∩ granted-scopes before the model gets a single token. Anything outside it is not summarised, not hinted at, not counted — it is never retrieved. An agent inherits its human's ceiling: it can be given less, never more.

Fail-closed · trimmed before generation · deniedByAcl is logged, not leaked

05 Analysis

Cited analysis is the starting point for the work ahead.

Connect the evidence into findings you can inspect: decisions and their rationale, conflicting facts, ownership and value. Those findings become context for meeting prep, knowledge transfer, onboarding, offboarding, reviews and agent workflows. The next layer turns the company’s memory into something your team can use.

Evidence, permissions and history carry forward into the workflow

An answer is only the beginning

Get the answer.
See what backs it up.

Ask a question your team would actually ask. Follow the answer back to the document, conversation or decision behind it.

Interactive sample · four prepared questions, no live company data

Choose a question.
Read the answer.
Open a source to check it.

Choose a sample question

Dana · Finance lead · sample viewerCurrent contextOnly permitted sources

The answer

Have a different question? Let’s explore it with your team ↗

Permissions, made visible

Same question. Two people. Two answers.

Watch the ACL gate sweep down the candidate rows: each one flips to permitted or withheld before anything is generated. Hover or focus any row to see the rule that produced the decision — including the ones that denied it.

Illustrative administrator view · sample data

—

right-hand asker

Being honest about this mockup: in the product, the right-hand asker sees the answer and a withheld count — never the hatched rows. We are showing them here because the mechanism is the point. A real denial returns nothing at all: no title, no snippet, no count of what lives behind it beyond the single number the asker is told.

visibility is strictly nested: agent:brief-bot ⊆ Sam ⊂ Dana — an agent inherits its human's groups and holds a narrower scope grant, so both operations only ever narrow the set.

There’s a whole story
behind that answer.

See the note that changed the plan, who owns the next step, and what was known at the time.

The reason, in the team’s own words.

Follow a launch date back to the planning note and the person responsible. The answer keeps its evidence attached.

Meet your company’s memory
Launch reviewIllustrative workspace
The question

Why did the launch move?

Maya ChenLaunch owner · product review
“Move the launch to 24 May. We need to finish the onboarding review before sign-off.”
Launch plan

Revision 3 · updated 12 May

Source attached

Target launch: 24 May

Dependency: onboarding review

Owner: Maya Chen

The date changed to allow time for the onboarding review. The plan and the owner’s note point to the same reason.

Sample people, dates and records · no customer data

Built for the moments that matter.

Less catching up.
More getting somewhere.

The same memory helps with handovers, customer context, vendor reviews and the agents working alongside you.

Explore all ten examples
JL
Jamie’s first weekIllustrative work story

“Who should I talk to
about Billing v2?”

Start with Maya. She owns the migration and wrote the current rollout plan.

M
MayaBilling migration owner
Found in the context

Engineering handbook
Launch planning conversation

Find the person. Arrive with the context.

Don’t just
take its word
for it.

A good answer gives you something to go on. Open the evidence. Check the date. Follow the decision back to the people who made it.

How trust works in Slashh
Answer / sourceIllustrative example

Why did the launch move?

The team moved the launch to to finish the onboarding review.

Select a highlighted claim to inspect its source.

Launch plan

Revision 3 · 12 May · Shared with the team

“Target launch: 24 May. Complete the onboarding review before final sign-off.”

Bring your team’s hardest question.Slashh / Private preview

The next
question
is yours.

Let’s talk

The decision nobody remembers.
The answer buried three tools deep.
Let’s see what we can connect.

Take another look at the product